Skip to content


On my own bias cc worldview and persepctives on technology…

kudos, to Mr. Stephen Corry on npr for saying something along the lines of, “We don’t view the Amish as ‘backward,’ why should we Tribal peoples?” 

I thoroughly enjoyed Mr. Corry’s discussion and wholeheartedly support his approach to re-valuing Indigenous and traditional worldview… Well aware of a knee-jerk response on my behalf when he mentioned the above sentiment… As a US city boy, it it really wasn’t until my recent time in Belize that I saw the Amish/Mennonite groups free from a sort of ridicule…

I’ve lived in regions where folks would stick to certain aspects of their traditional culture & lifestyle, while adopting the most of what would be considered a modern way of life.  In viewing the Amish back home, I did see them as a sort of ~backwards ~… But recently have experienced more closely the great efforts these groups go through to maintain certain tenets of their people, WHILE working with neighbors, communities and governments to achieve a sort of understanding…  Living right alongside traditional Mayan communities, these people seemed healthy, happy and were some of the most productive members of the nation.  Shunning modern technology isn’t exactly MY thing, but I got thinking… just because it’s a white person living a few miles away from the nearest station or mall, it really shouldn’t be my impulse to peg them as wacky.  I never really understood- It’s less a choice and more of a culture… A set of traditions honored across generations and generations.  …Definitely found myself guilty of the sort of supremacism I usually argue against…

Posted in Worldview/Indigenous Concerns, travel.

Tagged with , , , .


Global hardship abounds, meanwhile… All Glory to our Golden Corporate Overlords! America’s CEOs making more than ever!

Great News!  The global economy flounders, Earth’s environmental outlook becomes ever more dire, common folk the world over suffer from lack of opportunity and resources…

John Hammergren, CEO of healthcare provider McKesson, earned $145m last year. Photograph: George Nikitin/AP (he might be a nice guy.  I have no idea.  I’ll assume, with that kind of dough, that he’s really involved in conservation and social concerns.)

John Hammergren, CEO of healthcare provider McKesson, earned $145m last year. Photograph: George Nikitin/AP

But, Cheer up!  Top execs in the US enjoyed pay hikes of between 27 and 40% last year!

Woo-Hoo!  All Glory to the ruling class! We shall build gilded temples to their awesomeness!  Tremendous memorials built on the very backs of a hopeless middle-class; for each top earner a shining colossus in their likeness which shall stand for eons over the shattered landscape they’ve helped create!

We’ve covered some great info-graphics on this trend in previous posts.  

There is no surprise here, for many, in the continued disparity between workers in this world.  While wages for the majority of Americans fail to keep up with inflation, the very wealthiest citizens become ever more “well-to-do.”  What remains completely unfathomable to me, however, is how rapidly we see an increase in failure of schools, public programs and crucial environmental efforts IN THE FACE of this completely insane growth in personal profits.  People will continue to grab what they can.  I don’t expect anything less.  But in these difficult times (for MOST HUMANS), when I see project after project after project struggle to stay afloat and maintain efforts to save individuals in a sensitive ecosystem or troubled community… It makes me sick.  Actually, quite ill.  We have here the refined product of a global system that rapes human and environmental resources for the unsustainable benefit of a very few.  This cannot continue.  Time to step up to the plate, top earners, and pull your head out of your asses.  Falling off a cliff might feel like flying… until we all hit the bottom.  And despite what your chauffeur might tell you, we’re all on this ride together.

Posted in sustainable business.

Tagged with , , , , , , .


primo thoughts on the ~Green~ aesthetic in mid-century Modernism

Thoroughly enjoyed “Visual Acoustics: The Modernism of Julius Shulman” yesterday,delighted by the abundance of eye-candy presented in archive, but also caught by the thoughts shared with us by the artist himself.  Shulman may have well been the individual most familiar with the modernist wave that swept across America in the late 30s thru 60s…. All those beautiful, clean forms pushing the limit of what could be built in the day, all given the golden touch on film by a single man.

“The reason why this architecture photographs so beautifully is the environmental consideration exercised by the architects,” Shulman writes in his printed collection.

“It was the sense that here we have beautiful canyons, hillsides, views of the ocean. Everyone loves these photographs because the houses are environmentally involved, and this was before the emphasis on what everyone is calling green.”

This perspective on what could be considered the Green aesthetic has always been particularly interesting to me.  Modernist design, sensitive to how structural, functional, and design elements of a building will interact with both its natural surroundings and the people who occupy the spaces, has certainly has a resurgence in recent years.  Although many of these now-classic designs might not be entirely energy efficient by modern standards, a strong attention to surrounding environs truly defined this movement (as well as Shulman’s eye.)  Although Shulman’s work remained primarily in Southern California, this aesthetic was alive and well in the Midwest and East (think snowy snapshots of  Frank Lloyd Wright creations set perfectly into the midwestern landscape). 

All this strikes me as something of a wonderful comment on the awareness championed in any of today’s (good) architecture.  The language and materials have changed over the years, but these visionaries lauded principles then which we now demand of ANY structure which is to be both beautiful and sustainable.   “In any project, we cannot permit the ecology to be destroyed.  That is the lifeblood, the lifeline of our whole people…”

Posted in Uncategorized, design.

Tagged with , , .


Nifty new water reclamation system for the bathroom (easy to install!)

A follow-up to our earlier piece on Grey Water Systems in the US ->

Schematics of Sloans new water reclamation (GreyWater) system for the bathroom

Schematics of Sloans new water reclamation (GreyWater) system for the bathroom

Check out this nice little addition to the options available in GreyWater systems- Not for gardens, but for in the Home!  :)   The Sloan AQUS water reclamation system runs about $189 each and offers a simple DIY setup to take sink water and recycle it for flushing your toilet!  Folks at Inhabitat claim it could save you up to 6,000 gallons of water each year, AND, it seems you could actually win one through their site if you sign up for the newsletter!  Details Here.

I love the ease of installation Sloan seems to be pushing here.  The easier it gets for people to improve home efficiency, the better.  Put good products in people’s ‘hands, make them affordable, change the world just a little bit  ;)

Posted in design.

Tagged with , .


Tales from a land where kitchen & native plant gardens are a still No-No

Folks in Memphis could use a hand saving a neighborhood garden.  Or at least in adjusting their local land use policies.

Remember back when folks used to get tickets for making beautiful kitchen gardens in their front yards?  I mean, like 10 years ago, when you’d read about those crazy neighborhoods where a tax-paying home owner would receive some sort of cease-and-desist order from their stuffy neighbors for not pumping their yard full of pesticides and grass seed, but instead choosing to grow basil, berries or tomatoes?  …  Yea, I thought we were over that too, but apparently, in Memphis, fear of kitchen gardens remains alive and strong.

Mr. Guerreros home

Mr. Guerrero's home

Adam Guerrero has been a resident of Memphis for 10 years, a high school teacher for 6, and a gardener for ages.  In his front yard he has chosen to nurture produce and wild flowers in place of the standard Americanized lawn.  The garden, which he’s been working on for 2 years now in with help from his students and other kids from the neighborhood, has recently been deemed unsightly and grounds for criminal persecution if continued.

Got a note from the Kitchen Gardeners page (check them out on FaceBook!) describing Adam’s situation.  It’s certainly not unheard of.  We had this debate in Chicago about 10 years ago.  In California and Oregon, they had it 40 years ago.  Of course it creeps back from time to time.  Neighbors like consistency.  And laws concerned with sidewalk access and food safety often keep people from growing produce in their front yards.  But Mr. Guerrero is a home owner.  A tax payer.  This is his private property… and in the opinion of many (perhaps not his immediate neighbors,) he is putting the land to better use than simply greencarpeting it.

My little sister and her housemates have a lovely home in Santa Cruz, California, where, in their front yard, they maintain a massive and intricate garden.  It not only promotes and advertises her housemate’s garden education non-profit, it is the most gorgeous (and delicious,) yard on the block.  Back in Illinois, I recall a debate over the yard in front of a glorious mansion in Evanston (north of Chicago.)  For years, the homeowner had been cultivating a wonderful space for native plants, which, in Chicago, means a beautiful array of flowers and tall grasses that bloom in the spring and die back in the winter.  At some point, new neighbors moved in, and, forgetting we live in the MIDWEST PRAIRIELANDS, demanded the historic property replace its native masterpiece with a shorn expanse of always half-dead/half-cheminfused Frankenlawn.  The community rallied behind the resident and compromise was made.  The yard segment closest to the street would be turned back into good old American/HomeDepot grass seed, while the section closer to the house would be allowed to flourish as a native plant masterpiece, as long as it was kept tidy. 

In the case of Mr. Guerrero’s yard, The Memphis Flyer reports that there’s been no visible trash on the property and plants have been kept off the sidewalk and driveway.  Unfortunately, it sounds like neighbors are demanding a complete return to mowable lawn.  Including shopping down his 7-foot tall sunflowers.  It’s a shame.  The Flyer describes the yard as lovely- “eggplant, tomato, and pepper plants grow in the front yard; the backyard is lined with rows of wooden worm bins; barrels for collecting and storing rainwater are stationed next to his backdoor; his garage is stocked with equipment for making biodiesel and soap; and behind his garage are beehives quietly humming with industry. Elsewhere, passionflowers, butterflies, elderberry bushes, and sunflowers fill out the garden.”  There’s a great slideshow of images from the garden featured in the Flyer article.  Surely not common for a town-like setting, but surely there are others in the community that must recognize the project’s capacity for education and inspiration!

Kitchen Gardens have persevered and flourished in other regions of the country.  Let’s hope a middle ground can be found here- for the sake of Mr. Guerrero, his students, and their community.  Means for voicing support of Adam and his garden can be found here->

-Stand in Solidarity with Adam Guerrero-

Posted in design, eco-tourism, sustainable business.

Tagged with , , .


Greywater Systems Are Sweeping The Nation- Why Not Chicago???

Across the country, and certainly the world, people will speak the praise of integrated greywater systems in the modern homestead.  In dryer climates, particularly non-urban, these are often considered part and parcel of an efficient, comfortable abode.

(simple layout from GreyWater.com)

(simple layout from GreyWater.com)

The folks at EcologyAction in Santa Cruz have shared a nice article looking at how this phenomenon continues to sweep the community there.  Such re-use systems have gotten great exposure as both “hip” and functional since the early 70’s (especially with popular publications like Shelter , by Lloyd Kahn.)  But it seems we continue to have arguments as a modern American culture as to whether these approaches are truly sanitary and “worth-it.”

In the recent piece from the Santa Cruz Sentinel, author Gretchen Wegrich looks at how it is not merely aesthetics or a new sense of responsibility that has citizens turning back to the classic laundry grey water system, but true need.  Things are getting dryer in most of California, and the nation- greywater is becoming a must!

So why has Chicago continued to drag its feet on water use codes?  Far from outlawing the practice, Santa Cruz County is actually paying some residents a $75 rebate for customers who install greywater irrigation systems! You’ll hear it’s because of population density, but increasingly, just as we saw with food plots in front yards, cities and towns are waking up to the understanding that these sustainable methods can, and indeed, often MUST, be a part of a contemporary approach to dwelling design.  Chicago has the luxury of copious volumes of fresh water…  Will this remain our excuse for waste?  While others in our world, nation, and, in fact, Illinois pay higher and higher fees for water use?  Will we continue to demand that residents water their shrubs with highly processed, impeccable drinking water?!?  I’m hoping we’ll see the Second City follow up its recent push for a sparkly Green image by modernizing their water use codes, and letting us use of our washer run-off for our backyards.  It’s safe, fun, and gardens love it!

Posted in Chicago, design, sustainable business.


Now we’re talking! Windy City Separated Bike Lane Makes Its Debut!

awesome. Superawesome. Big step in the right direction imo

Chicago Department of Transportation is installing Chicago’s first protected bike lane!

Some will argue sharing the road means a complete and seamless integration of bike, auto and pedestrian traffic.  But

I don’t think there’s much in the way of moving forward unless you separate the traffic, or find a way to ensure both drivers and bikers are educated, policed properly, and sober/capable… As those things seem difficult in even the most pro-active of communities, and a very very far way off in this, the city of 1800’s ethos, physically dividing the paths really seems the only way to significantly increase bike transit while at least minimizing door checks, swerves and intersection bungles…

Posted in Chicago, design, travel.


The Basics: Why Should Your Small Enterprise “Go Green?”

(feature piece from my work with the Non-Profit, Winning Workplaces.  Again asserting that we, as a society, must see green practices as essential and inseparable from legitimate and robust business tactics.  Original publication here)

Why Should Your Small Enterprise “Go Green?”

Efficiency sells better than sex these days.  Waste is increasingly a flagrant faux pas.  And yes, green is, and HAS BEEN, the new black. In biz speak, efforts by organizations to “go green” are paying dividends beyond fundamental gains/saves to the local environment.  More small enterprises than ever are warming up to the notion that they can save money, boost the value of their brand and make a difference in their communities by implementing green workplace practices.

Their customers certainly seem to be moving in this direction. Research by Colorado-based nonprofit Conscious Wave finds that consumers have established a nearly $230 billion stake in the U.S. marketplace devoted to health and sustainability.

And they’re not alone – more workers are realizing the benefits of greener workplaces as well. Bob Willard, a former leader at IBM and the author of “The Next Sustainability Wave,” conservatively estimates that 20 percent of job candidates are drawn to businesses that tout green practices.

The following are accounts of three very different small organizations, encompassing a range of industries, that made the decision to go green inside their workplaces. While they vary in their green initiatives and how they have gone about implementing them, they share one commonality: They are all solid workplaces made even stronger through their focus on doing more to harm less on this planet.

Let There Be (Efficient) Light

The government’s Energy Star program reports that U.S. small businesses could save more than $15 billion a year by cutting their energy consumption by 30 percent. In order to manage costs while remaining competitive as an innovator in the metal forming industry, Illinois-based IRMCO has joined this club. Despite its origins as an old-line manufacturer in a warehouse facility that has served the firm for four generations, the family-owned business is showing that a workplace with a rich history needn’t hesitate to adapt.

It starts with the simple things. “If you’re not in a room, shut the lights off,” says IRMCO’s Operations Manager, T.J. Kerkman. He claims it used to be common practice for his staff to arrive and turn on every light in the warehouse. Now, following an energy audit of the company’s electrical usage last year, it’s lights out when the last employee leaves a room.

For More Information: Easy Steps Toward a Greener     Workplace

Useful Web Resources

Numerous groups across the country offer free energy audits for businesses and nonprofits. In addition, ENERGYguide.com provides a basic but effective online tool to help you evaluate your usage. Kerkman describes the results of IRMCO’s energy audit as “eye-opening.” “We’re looking at last year’s electric bill and this year’s electric bill and … we’re talking a 50 percent savings,” he says.

LEED-ing the Way

Recently, Christy Webber Landscapes, a growing enterprise that develops projects at commercial and residential properties throughout the Chicago area, took advantage of an opportunity to build a new central office that would be LEED certified. Much touted, the designation means that the firm’s facility meets or exceeds U.S. Green Building Council benchmarks for building design, construction and operation. Besides LEED’s obvious environmental benefits, it carries a level of national recognition for facility construction and – HR managers take note – the promise of a higher-quality work environment for potential hires.

Currently, Christy Webber’s facility makes use of solar and geothermal heating/cooling, a vegetative roof cover, weather-responsive lighting, rain water conservation and methods for harnessing wind for power and ventilation. The result is a facility that now uses 55 percent less energy than the average commercial property, according to Midwest Real Estate News and Chicago Building Congress.

The landscaping firm’s transition to LEED certification is even more interesting given its diverse (and often seasonal) workforce, for whom even the notion of recycling was new. To match inside practices with its environmentally friendly facility, the firm’s existing “Green Team” helped to establish the following workplace initiatives:

• Small recycling bins on everyone’s desks
• The use of only “green” cleaning products
• Substituting flatware for plastic ware
• Using the dishwasher only once per day
• Training supervisors on how to practice conservation in the field

Mission-driven Take-home Practices

Seventh Generation, a Vermont-based marketer of environmentally responsible household products, uses many of the same eco-friendly measures as the two firms mentioned above. In addition, they are working to encourage employees to use green behavior far beyond the workplace.

The company offers a unique benefits package that includes subsidies for employee-purchased hybrid and electric vehicles and financial assistance to help workers build greener homes. Manager of HR Stephanie Lowe says these incentives evolved from the firm’s core value of “regenerative thinking.” This concept, no doubt, trickled down from President Jeffrey Hollender, who also defines his role as “Chief Regeneration Officer.”

Gregor Barnum, director of corporate consciousness, points to a focus on critical design – not only in the development of its products, but also in shaping employees’ lives. “We’ve got 60 different employees, with different lifestyles. The way we look at it, that’s 60 designers on our team,” Barnum says.

In 2005, the company let its employee-designers loose to shape their work environment when it moved into a new facility in its hometown of Burlington. Design consultations between the entire staff and the building architect yielded eco-friendly measures including carpets made from recyclable materials and a place in the firm’s parking garage to plug in their company-subsidized electric cars.

The (Triple) Bottom Line

As these examples of green workplace practices show, small enterprises can go small or big, and as deep into the pocketbook as they feel comfortable. (IRMCO and Christy Webber’s measures in particular show that going green can actually cost nothing or next to nothing at all.) And as we’ve illustrated, beyond making sound business sense, a move toward a more eco-friendly workplace can align actions with core values and, thus, boost the brand.

The point is to do something. There is a sense of urgency behind all eco-friendly workplace practices, as Fast Company magazine pointed out in summarizing its green-themed list of the “Fast 50″ growing companies. Indeed, as the magazine also stated, “Companies of every size and in every part of the world are now waking up to humanity’s impending and interlocking crises, and the vastly lucrative rewards that solving them might bring.”

(Diane Stoneman contributed to this article.)

Posted in design, sustainable business.

Tagged with , , , .


Thoughts on the rise of “Technomads” … are we, in fact, “taking less” home from our travels?

Mr. Sean Bonner has an interesting piece featured on BoingBoing this month,

kicking around thoughts on the growing tendency toward the “Technomad” and “neo-minimalist” identity in culture… Lifestyles made light by ease, efficiency and slightness of technology have lead o travel patterns (for work, pleasure, LIVING what have you) defined more by concept and experience and less by need for bulky luggage and equipment (or, additionally, the means and ways to carry, protect and house such gear.)

Bonner offers some considerate observations from his own journeys… prompting what I feel is a great conversation on the changing role of not only the need for gear in travel, but the way in which we approach possessions and settlement in general.  It’s a conversation ripe for assessing our drive to collect and retain trinkets & treasures gleaned from these chapters in our lives… a look at how it seems many of us may collect and drag around less and less in our lives given the changing role of gear and communications…

I dig it.  I dig it.  But the drive to survey, collect and return with treasure remains strong in me… lots of us, yea?  All them stones and stories from places and people… This fella Sean hits on some solid questions… and truths… but I haven’t perused enough of his material to get a feel for his photo trends… Carry what you want… but much of this, his use and ownership of “things…” relies on slightness and ease of new technologies & means of communication… how exactly does a re-evaluation of possessions and sense of self adapt on the road… versus merely getting re-packaged given new tools?

Given a re-assessment of self and ownership, how many photos will he collect?… what would such data and impression collecting have looked like 70 years ago?  heavy. fragile. and demanding a storehouse upon his return… (Again, even having a place to retain/preserve these impressions would have tied the individual more to a particular place and to the accompanying an accumulation of ~things~…)

Posted in design, travel.


Definition/promotion of “Local” food leads to head-smashing

Head-Butts and Fist Fights in Portland over definition/promotion of “Local” Foods…

Sure, fighting is wrong, but if you’re gonna be drunk and head-butt someone…

“I thought there was more than adequate number of farmers [here] to pull pigs [for Cochon 555] from Oregon. I told that to local chefs involved in the event,” says Bechard,… who admits that he was in both fights…”They are self-promoting this event and their [out-of-town] farmers. It should have promoted our farmers.”

(Bechard, an attendee at the food event, was angry that Lowe had allowed a pig from Iowa (the winning pig, in fact) to be used as part of the Portland Cochon 555 competition.)

*Entertaining link from Willamette Week featuring some good quotes from the chefs/combatants

*But a more ~contemplative~ discussion at NYTimes looking at the PDX region in the larger “Local” dialogue….

Posted in sustainable business.

Tagged with , , , .